Quote:
I am not one who thinks of "tradition" as automatically bad, because there are numerous traditions and all traditions can be either wonderfully supportive of the being of the horse, or abusive.
Hi Karen,
Did you listen to the entire webinar?
I am always eager to learn. Could you please tell me some of the 'traditions' that have benefited the domestic horse?
In the general horse world:It is traditional to use spurs.
It is traditional to use a bit in the horse's mouth.
It is traditional to train a horse using some sort of whip and pressure/release, comfort/discomfort and pain.
Also, I said,
"I'm not one for trying to legislate what is, or is NOT abuse, (although part of me would REALLY like to).
But I sincerely wish that there was a law that required listening to this entire webinar before purchasing or in any way assuming the responsibility and/or use of a horse."
I did NOT say to absolutely abide by the webinar. The webinar refers to common sense and compassion for management and care for the domestic horse from someone I feel is a 'credible source.'
If you feel that this is not suitable for horse owners on a learning curve, that's fine. But I did, and so do many others. If you don't I'd appreciate knowing why you don't.
In it, she states:
"If you cannot afford your horse a lifestyle that keeps him sound, (meaning emotionally and physically in regards to stalling) then you are not operating in the best interest of the horse.
It will take some thinking, and require change."
That's why I offered it, (for some thinking).
I especially liked Simon's article entitled, 'All I want for Christmas is a whip.' '
Tradition' again...Then there's this from an equine magazine in France:
"There is nothing wrong with tradition, except when it has passed its use-by date.
How can we tell ? Easy; we subject traditional methods to the modern tools called science, critical reasoning and ethics. If those methods stand up to our tests there is no problem; both their credibility and integrity are intact. But if they don't, then we have no sensible choice but to leave them in the past - and move forward.
If this all sounds too simple, it is. We don't care too much for changes that tilt our view of the world and our place in it so, no matter how much new methods may attract us on the basis of reason, there is an emotional cost to abandoning old and trusted ways of doing things. (It's called 'extinction-induced fear.)
At Natural Horse Planet magazine we understand these feelings, we have traveled that same road. We know these challenges inspire a little fear, which in turn sometimes births a little anger. We know that it is far easier to be commercial by diluting the message, and softening the challenge. But we also know that is not what the magazine is about.
We promise our readers to present our findings as honestly as possible, through our own features and contributions from authorities in the equine sciences. We won't make it soft and fuzzy. We won't water it down. We will show them the unequivocal truth, to judge for themselves."
And this from the Equine Veterinary Journal: (Dr. Deborah Goodwin)
"When we consider the reasons for people keeping horses and the way that they are managed, a great deal seems contrary to the behaviour which has ensured the horse's survival. People
restrict horses' freedom and ability to maintain social relationships; we expect them to allow
our presence in areas which make them vulnerable to attack; we make them jump over easily avoidable objects and expend energy travelling in repeated circles. This is not to say that the
horse has not benefited from its association with man, but unfortunately human culture has
both helped and hindered our understanding of the horse. All too often those horses which
cannot adapt to the conditions that we impose on them are destroyed. However, by appreciating the adaptive significance of equine behaviour, sympathetic and effective management of the horse can be achieved. Most people who own horses have their best interests at heart, but if misconceptions and inertia in traditional management systems are not challenged, improvements are likely to be slow to emerge."
I am simply offering dichotomic characterizations of Tradition/Culture (what humans need and live for) as clearly opposed to Nature -- what horses need and live for.
As do these videos by two highly esteemed International horse people.
Toxic Trainers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqcLADsOA0c Sikunder's Law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GoKhLYO ... re=relatedSo, I wasn't dictating what anyone should believe or do as an absolute, (just listen to it as 'food for thought.'
kind regards,
Chuck & Kids