I can hardly remember a time when I was not involved in the question now being considered.
I majored in related college course work that I applied to the question.
And of course both observed, experimented, and questioned and read others thoughts.
I have stayed away from answers that might be in the realm of the supernatural, though I don't deny or defend. Any definition I've seen of the term shows it's armored against analysis and scientific method.
I accept that.
This said, however, my attitude pointed me toward the macro and micro possibilities, and compounds of both.
So that is where I went.
We know now, and have for a very long time that we are wired ourselves (let alone our horses being wired similarly) to pick up signals through our sense that we are not consciously aware of.
And these enter into the micro category. We respond to molecules. Now that's micro.
Put a few molecules of sexually related hormones in the air and we respond, often without being aware we are doing so.
Put a few molecules in the air that are related to the body's reaction to threat, and once again we respond.
Sometimes this can help explain why we have unexplainable reactions, a sense of something, but only our reactions to examine.
Considering, if you hold with evolution, the millions of years of pressure on us, and survival being the prize, it seems logical to assume ourselves, as the organism we are, would develop extremely keen sensors.
But why would they operate a lot outside our conscious awareness?
To get around our over processing and the risk that puts us at.
If I am wandering the Savannah, and have a sudden wild urge to run to and climb the nearest tree, and don't follow up my urge, I could be dead in a few seconds. Lion food.
Or it could have been nothing. Or a stray wisp of hunting lion scent in a few molecules. So practice climbing the tree is a good thing. Even if the lion does not show up.
We live longer, breed more, have more progeny genetically predisposed to climb trees when the sudden urge comes over them.
Most this scenario to the horse.
Now how many times have we seen horses suddenly stop and gaze off in the distance? If we are with them and trusted most often they will discontinue and go back to feeding. But in the wild, one or two will do this, give a low nasal sound and the herd will collectively begin to move off.
I presume in the direction away from where the scent or sound or sight is located. Those that fail to do this are no longer represented genetically.
Using binoculars to watch horses in the wild I've seen this again and again, and if I waited along came a coyote or pair, trailing the horses.
Once a mountain lion. More times than I can count, a bear.
And those times I saw the herd suddenly bolt and run wildly off? The predator came in downwind, usually in a gully out of sight, and stalked very softly and slowly, until they had to come out in the open, or the wind changed, or they made an error in movement and produced a noise.
What does this have to do with communication?
We are, if I understand the paleantologists correctly, descended from pack humans. Organized on similar lines as canine packs. Not exactly, of course.
But we, like horses, and dogs, read each other at extremely subtle levels. We communicate.
You know you have had someone speak nicely to you, sweetly even, and it made the hair on the back of your neck stand up. Either the speech pattern (choice of words), tone of voice, tone patterns, body posture, facial expression, or possibly a scent from them gave away that this person was dangerous in some way. Predator.
So, does this extend to the horse-human connection?
I've said from time to time to individuals, that the horse was reading very subtle signals, communication, from the human.
It's why, many years ago, as I thought about it, I decided to no longer be the stoic silent horse trainer I was at the time. I began to talk to horses because I believed and still do, that as we process verbally we tend also to follow with our body ... in any or all of the ways we have to communicate besides just words.
Example: I'm down with a fearsome cold. Wrung out. Cleaning Altea's stall this morning I had one last pile I'd left to the end because it was behind her as she stood aligned with the wall with her head in her feed bucket.
I asked her to "move over Altea." She ignored me. I put my hand on her hip and shoved. She move, but slowly, reluctantly and even with some resistance back against my hand.
I stopped, thought about it and said, in a way that I think reflected my exasperation, my weariness, my sickness, my desire to get out of the cold, all the things I was feeling, "Please move over."
Not loud. Not even with what I could identify as an imperative in my voice. Just my weariness and thinking about the relief I wanted.
She quietly moved completely over to the other wall of the corner.
I thanked her and continued my morning stall muffin meditation, as best I could.
I believe that if we are genuine, that is make the effort to be in touch with our inner state of being in the moment, even stopping if need be to review what is up with us, and THEN communicate to the horse, even not speaking at all, just standing, or sitting, or whatever our position, and wait, their brain will sort out the incoming signals and read our communication.
The fantastic aspect of AND is that it is practiced by us so often as a trust building association that all the garbage that comes with orthodoxy in horse handling is finally sloughed off. Letting go of the pressure. Asking and waiting and accepting non compliance, accepting what is offered even if it's not what we asked for are among those relationship building activities we engage in.
In other words, we like our horses. Our ponies. In fact, at risk of embarrassment, I can say we love them to varying degrees, with all that can entail in motivating us to develop a deeper relationship that the orthodox methods can.
So our communication moves to a very different plane. More of us is read and understood by the horse. Conversely we free ourselves up, and are motivated, to pay attention, to attend to the horse, in ways we read them better.
Another great advantage to AND is that we have each other to support this and explore this and nurture this new model of communication.
In my mind, as I consider Altea, and other horses I have been in contact with recently, the Red mare, three students horses, the foal waiting to be born, and I think about communicating with them, I work on forming an AND Paradigm like the one I am attempting to explore above.
Yes I do talk to the foal, and Altea about the foal as well.
We'll see where that goes.
I see in Altea what I think is a desire to communicate, to understand me more fully when I "speak," to her. I'll have to continue to ask her to show me how this works.
Is it a supernatural connection I'll never know the mechanics of, or is it the unconscious levels of multi-sensory communication we evolved?
Tough question. One I'll never have the answer to, likely.
But then, I don't mind.
I am pleased though that others seek answers to the same concept: human-animal communication.
Donald
_________________ Love is Trust, trust is All ~~~~~~~~~ So say Don, Altea, and Bonnie the Wonder Filly.
|